Closings: Schools, churches, day-cares and businesses

People oppose red light cameras for all the wrong reasons

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Data pix.
ST. LOUIS, MO (KPLR) – Most people who complain about red light cameras are the ones who got caught by red light cameras. And most of them, or at least whoever was driving their car, are probably guilty. The complainers can whine all they want about government intrusion. But, they're just trying to dodge having to pay a ticket for rolling through a red light. Having said that, it seems that the Missouri courts have gotten it right. Red light cameras are, and should be, illegal.

Here's why. Anyone getting a red light camera ticket is presumed to be guilty. It's not like you got a ticket from a police officer and can face your accuser in court. You got a ticket from a robo cam attached to a light pole, and the presumption is, the machine was right and you are wrong. That was the ruling from a Missouri appeals court that ruled red light cameras violate article one section ten of the Missouri constitution. The line that says no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

A judge in St. Louis City has tossed out the city's red light camera ordinance by noting that not only does it seem to be unconstitutional, but, that it seems designed not for public safety but for earning money. Specifically, earning a little money for the cities that use the cameras and a whole lot of money for the private for-profit companies that install and run the red light cameras. That would also make red light camera ordinances unconstitutional.

So, red light cameras should be illegal. But, this doesn't negate the reality, the reality that people who've been nailed by the cameras are probably guilty as all get-out. They just don't want to pay up and get caught. But, in opposing red light cameras, they're doing the right thing, just for all the wrong reasons.

I'm Charles Jaco and that's Jacology.


  • doris

    I believe your first paragraph is untrue as I have never received a red light camera ticket and have opposed these devices since they were first proposed in Arnold.

  • wrongonred

    I have never received a Red Light Camera ticket, or any other ticket in 15 years, however, I am vehemently opposed to the cameras, however, you also neglect to mention the graft which underlies the systems. Redflex is under Federal Indictment in the City of Chicago for bribery, and ATS did much the same thing here with their consultancy agreement with Joyce Aboussie. It is only a matter of time before the FBI Investigation in Chicago expands here, if it has not already.

  • bald eagle

    I’ve never been ticketed by those things either, but they are clearly unconstitutional. Furthermore the company’s that run those should be ashamed of themselves its fraudulent robbery. Not to mention that I cannot tell you how many times I almost got into an accident because someone SLAMMED on their brakes when its yellow in order to avoid this (fake) ticket.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.