This is a great decision in support of the fourth amendment. If this was the 19th century. What five of the supremes did was focus on the fact that there was a physical intrusion on private property. As is all too often the case, a thorough reading of the decision, which I invite you to do. Read them, become familiar with the logic and procedure of legal analysis. But the analysis of the case shows that four justices wanted to know, in a twenty first century world, what about in cases of public video surveillance, Metrocards, EZ pass toll collection or GPS configurations that are factory installed in vehicles like OnStar.
This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.