Supreme Court debates church-state dispute over public prayers
WASHINGTON (CNN) — A divided Supreme Court, debating Wednesday whether public prayer at a New York town’s board meetings are permissible, looked at the country’s history of religious acknowledgment in the legislature and the court’s own traditions.
Two local women — an atheist and a Jew — brought suit against Greece, New York, officials, objecting that the monthly public sessions on government open with invocations they say have been overwhelming Christian in nature over the years.
The hour of sharp oral arguments presented another contentious case over the intersection of faith and the civic arena. The court’s conservative majority appeared to have the votes to allow the policy to continue in some form, but both sides expressed concerns about the level of judicial and government oversight over the content presented by members of a particular faith.
“We are a very religiously diverse country,” said Justice Samuel Alito, who worried about the town officials articulating binding guidelines on what can be said. “All should be treated equally. So I can’t see how you can compose a prayer that is acceptable to all these” religions.
But Justice Sonia Sotomayor worried about the effect on local citizens who choose not to stand and bow their heads when asked during a public prayer.
“Why wouldn’t they feel coerced in some way?”
The high court began its public session Wednesday as it has for decades, with the marshal invoking a traditional statement that ends, “God save the United States and this honorable court.”
The ground rules for public prayers at government meetings have been murky for decades, said Charles C. Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center. The Supreme Court is not likely to strike down the prayer practices, but may instead seek to offer greater clarity, he said.
“This is going to affect communities across the country,” he predicted.
Haynes said the frequent fights over public prayers, Ten Commandment memorials and holiday displays might strike some Americans as silly, but they touch on deep questions about national identity: Is the United States a “nation under God,” for example. And are the “blessings of liberty” derived from the divine?
“It’s a long struggle in our country about self-definition and what our country was founded to be,” Haynes said. “That’s why we keep circling back to these emotional and highly divisive questions.”
The case is Town of Greece, N.Y. v. Galloway (12-696). A ruling is expected by early summer.
By Bill Mears
CNN’s Daniel Burke contributed to this report.